Home / News / The 160 QI man Stephen W. Hawking is died

The 160 QI man Stephen W. Hawking is died

« Not since Albert Einstein has a researcher so caught general society creative ability and charmed himself to countless individuals around the globe, » Michio Kaku, a teacher of hypothetical material science at the City University of New York, said in a meeting.

Dr. Hawking did that to a great extent through his book « A Brief History of Time: From the Big Bang to Black Holes, » distributed in 1988. It has sold in excess of 10 million duplicates and motivated a narrative film by Errol Morris. The 2014 film about his life, « The Theory of Everything, » was designated for a few Academy Awards and Eddie Redmayne, who played Dr. Hawking, won the Oscar for best performer.

 

Deductively, Dr. Hawking will be best associated with a disclosure so peculiar that it may be communicated as a Zen koan: When is a dark gap not dark? When it detonates.

Is similarly astonishing that he had a profession by any stretch of the imagination. As a graduate understudy in 1963, he learned he had amyotrophic horizontal sclerosis, a neuromuscular squandering infection otherwise called Lou Gehrig’s illness. He was given just a couple of years to live.

 

 

The sickness decreased his real control to the flexing of a finger and deliberate eye developments yet left his intellectual capacities untouched.

 

He went ahead to end up his age’s pioneer in investigating gravity and the properties of dark gaps, the unlimited gravitational pits so profound and thick that not by any means light can escape them.

 

That work prompted a defining moment in current material science, running its course in the end a very long time of 1973 on the dividers of his cerebrum when Dr. Hawking set out to apply quantum hypothesis, the odd laws that oversee subatomic reality, to dark gaps. In a long and overwhelming estimation, Dr. Hawking found to his befuddlement that dark gaps — those fanciful symbols of enormous fate — were not by any stretch of the imagination dark. Truth be told, he discovered, they would in the long run fail, spilling radiation and particles, lastly detonate and vanish over the ages.

 

No one, including Dr. Hawking, trusted it at first — that particles could be leaving a dark opening. « I wasn’t searching for them by any means, » he reviewed in a meeting in 1978. « I just stumbled over them. I was fairly irritated. »

 

That estimation, in a postulation distributed in 1974 in the diary Nature under the title « Dark Hole Explosions?, » is hailed by researchers as the primary incredible point of interest in the battle to locate a solitary hypothesis of nature — to associate gravity and quantum mechanics, those warring depictions of the substantial and the little, to clarify a universe that appears to be more bizarre than anyone had thought.

 

The revelation of Hawking radiation, as it is known, flipped around dark gaps. It changed them from destroyers to makers — or if nothing else to recyclers — and twisted the fantasy of a last hypothesis in an unusual, new heading.

 

« You can ask what will transpire who bounces into a dark gap, » Dr. Hawking said in a meeting in 1978. « I absolutely don’t figure he will survive it.

 

« Then again, » he included, « in the event that we send somebody off to bounce into a dark gap, neither he nor his constituent molecules will return, yet his mass vitality will return. Perhaps that applies to the entire universe. »

 

Dennis W. Sciama, a cosmologist and Dr. Hawking’s proposition counsel at Cambridge, called Hawking’s postulation in Nature « the most wonderful paper ever. »

 

Edward Witten, a scholar at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, stated: « Attempting to comprehend Hawking’s revelation better has been a wellspring of much crisp reasoning for right around 40 years now, and we are most likely still a long way from completely dealing with it. Regardless it feels new. »

In 2002, Dr. Hawking said he needed the recipe for Hawking radiation to be engraved on his gravestone.

 

He was a man who pushed the points of confinement — in his scholarly life, no doubt, yet in addition in his expert and individual lives. He ventured to every part of the globe to logical gatherings, going to each landmass, including Antarctica; composed smash hit books about his work; wedded twice; fathered three kids; and was not above showing up on « The Simpsons, » « Star Trek: The Next Generation » or « The Big Bang Theory. »

 

He praised his 60th birthday celebration by going up in a hot-air expand. That week, he additionally smashed his electric-fueled wheelchair while speeding around a corner in Cambridge, breaking his leg.

 

In April 2007, a couple of months after his 65th birthday celebration, he partook in a zero-gravity flight on board an exceptionally prepared Boeing 727, a cushioned airplane that flies a crazy ride direction to create transitory times of weightlessness. It was a prelude to a sought after excursion to space with Richard Branson’s Virgin Galactic organization on board SpaceShipTwo.

 

Inquired as to why he went out on a limb, Dr. Hawking stated, « I need to demonstrate that individuals require not be constrained by physical cripples as long as they are not incapacitated in soul. »

 

His own soul left numerous in amazement.

 

« What a triumph his life has been, » said Martin Rees, a Cambridge University cosmologist, the space expert illustrious of Britain and Dr. Hawking’s long-lasting partner. « His name will live in the records of science; millions have had their grandiose skylines broadened by his top rated books; and much more, around the globe, have been enlivened by a special case of accomplishment against all the chances — an appearance of stunning self control and assurance. »

 

Stephen William Hawking was conceived in Oxford, England, on Jan. 8, 1942 — 300 years to the day, he got a kick out of the chance to bring up, after the demise of Galileo, who had started the investigation of gravity. His mom, the previous Isobel Walker, had gone to Oxford to dodge the bombs that fell daily amid the Blitz of London. His dad, Frank Hawking, was a conspicuous research scholar.

 

The most seasoned of four kids, Stephen was an average understudy at St. Albans School in London, however his natural brightness was perceived by a few colleagues and educators.

 

Afterward, at University College, Oxford, he discovered his investigations in arithmetic and material science so natural that he once in a while counseled a book or took notes. He got by with a thousand hours of work in three years, or one hour daily, he assessed. « Nothing appeared to be worth endeavoring for, » he said.

 

The main subject he discovered energizing was cosmology since, he stated, it managed « the unavoidable issue: Where did the universe originate from? »

 

Upon graduation, he moved to Cambridge. Before he could start his examination, in any case, he was stricken by what his exploration counsel, Dr. Sciama, came to call « that shocking thing. »

 

The youthful Hawking had been encountering periodic shortcoming and falling spells for quite a long while. Not long after his 21st birthday, in 1963, specialists disclosed to him that he had amyotrophic sidelong sclerosis. They gave him under three years to live.

 

His first reaction was serious despondency. He envisioned he would have been executed, he said. At that point, despite seemingly insurmountable opposition, the infection seemed to balance out. Despite the fact that he was gradually losing control of his muscles, he was as yet ready to walk short separations and perform basic errands, however relentlessly, such as dressing and stripping. He felt another feeling of reason.

 

« When you are looked with the likelihood of an early passing, » he reviewed, « it influences you to understand that life merits living and that there are a considerable measure of things you need to do. »

 

In 1965, he wedded Jane Wilde, an understudy of etymology. Presently, by his own particular record, he not just had « a comment for »; he additionally needed to discover an occupation, which gave him a motivating force to work truly toward his doctorate.

 

His disease, in any case, had denied him of the capacity to record the long chains of conditions that are the instruments of the cosmologist’s exchange. Typically, he transformed this disable into a quality, assembling his energies for brave jumps of thought, which, in his later years, he regularly left for others to arrange in appropriate numerical dialect.

 

« Individuals have the mixed up impression that arithmetic is simply conditions, » Dr. Hawking said. « Indeed, conditions are only the exhausting piece of science. »

 

By need, he focused on issues that could be assaulted through « pictures and charts, » receiving geometric methods that had been contrived in the mid 1960s by the mathematician Roger Penrose and a kindred Cambridge partner, Brandon Carter, to think about general relativity, Einstein’s hypothesis of gravity.

 

Dark gaps are a characteristic forecast of that hypothesis, which clarifies how mass and vitality « bend » space, the way a dozing individual makes a sleeping pad droop. Light beams will twist as they navigate a gravitational field, similarly as a marble moving on the drooping bedding will pursue a circular segment around the sleeper.

 

An excessive amount of mass or vitality in one spot could make space droop without end; a protest that was sufficiently thick, similar to an enormous falling star, could wrap space around itself like a conjurer’s shroud and vanish, contracting inside to a state of unbounded thickness called a peculiarity, an astronomical deadlock, where the known laws of material science would separate: a dark gap.

 

Einstein himself thought this was foolish when the likelihood was indicated out him.

 

Using the Hubble Space Telescope and other sophisticated tools of observation and analysis, however, astronomers have identified hundreds of objects that are too massive and dark to be anything but black holes, including a supermassive one at the center of the Milky Way. According to current theory, the universe should contain billions more.

 

As part of his Ph.D. thesis in 1966, Dr. Hawking showed that when you ran the film of the expanding universe backward, you would find that such a singularity had to have existed sometime in cosmic history; space and time, that is, must have had a beginning. He, Dr. Penrose and a rotating cast of colleagues went on to publish a series of theorems about the behavior of black holes and the dire fate of anything caught in them.

 

Dr. Hawking’s signature breakthrough resulted from a feud with the Israeli theoretical physicist Jacob Bekenstein, then a Princeton graduate student, about whether black holes could be said to have entropy, a thermodynamic measure of disorder. Dr. Bekenstein said they could, pointing out a close analogy between the laws that Dr. Hawking and his colleagues had derived for black holes and the laws of thermodynamics.

 

Dr. Hawking said no. To have entropy, a black hole would have to have a temperature. But warm objects, from a forehead to a star, radiate a mixture of electromagnetic radiation, depending on their exact temperatures. Nothing could escape a black hole, and so its temperature had to be zero. “I was very down on Bekenstein,” Dr. Hawking recalled.

 

To settle the question, Dr. Hawking decided to investigate the properties of atom-size black holes. This, however, required adding quantum mechanics, the paradoxical rules of the atomic and subatomic world, to gravity, a feat that had never been accomplished. Friends turned the pages of quantum theory textbooks as Dr. Hawking sat motionless staring at them for months. They wondered if he was finally in over his head.

 

When he eventually succeeded in doing the calculation in his head, it indicated to his surprise that particles and radiation were spewing out of black holes. Dr. Hawking became convinced that his calculation was correct when he realized that the outgoing radiation would have a thermal spectrum characteristic of the heat radiated by any warm body, from a star to a fevered forehead. Dr. Bekenstein had been right.

 

Dr. Hawking even figured out a way to explain how particles might escape a black hole. According to quantum principles, the space near a black hole would be teeming with “virtual” particles that would flash into existence in matched particle-and-antiparticle pairs — like electrons and their evil twin opposites, positrons — out of energy borrowed from the hole’s intense gravitational field.

 

They would then meet and annihilate each other in a flash of energy, repaying the debt for their brief existence. But if one of the pair fell into the black hole, the other one would be free to wander away and become real. It would appear to be coming from the black hole and taking energy away from it.

 

But those, he cautioned, were just words. The truth was in the math.

 

“The most important thing about Hawking radiation is that it shows that the black hole is not cut off from the rest of the universe,” Dr. Hawking said.

 

It also meant that black holes had a temperature and had entropy. In thermodynamics, entropy is a measure of wasted heat. But it is also a measure of the amount of information — the number of bits — needed to describe what is in a black hole. Curiously, the number of bits is proportional to the black hole’s surface area, not its volume, meaning that the amount of information you could stuff into a black hole is limited by its area, not, as one might naïvely think, its volume.

 

That result has become a litmus test for string theory and other pretenders to a theory of quantum gravity. It has also led to speculations that we live in a holographic universe, in which three-dimensional space is some kind of illusion.

 

Andrew Strominger, a Harvard string theorist, said of the holographic theory, “If it’s really true, it’s a deep and beautiful property of our universe — but not an obvious one.”

 

The discovery of black hole radiation also led to a 30-year controversy over the fate of things that had fallen into a black hole.

 

Dr. Hawking initially said that detailed information about whatever had fallen in would be lost forever because the particles coming out would be completely random, erasing whatever patterns had been present when they first fell in. Paraphrasing Einstein’s complaint about the randomness inherent in quantum mechanics, Dr. Hawking said, “God not only plays dice with the universe, but sometimes throws them where they can’t be seen.”

 

Many particle physicists protested that this violated a tenet of quantum physics, which says that knowledge is always preserved and can be retrieved. Leonard Susskind, a Stanford physicist who carried on the argument for decades, said, “Stephen correctly understood that if this was true, it would lead to the downfall of much of 20th-century physics.”

 

On another occasion, he characterized Dr. Hawking to his face as “one of the most obstinate people in the world; no, he is the most infuriating person in the universe.” Dr. Hawking grinned.

 

Dr. Hawking admitted defeat in 2004. Whatever information goes into a black hole will come back out when it explodes. One consequence, he noted sadly, was that one could not use black holes to escape to another universe. “I’m sorry to disappoint science fiction fans,” he said.

 

Despite his concession, however, the information paradox, as it is known, has become one of the hottest and deepest topics in theoretical physics. Physicists say they still do not know how information gets in or out of black holes.

 

Raphael Bousso of the University of California, Berkeley, and a former student of Dr. Hawking’s, said the present debate had raised “by another few notches” his estimation of the “stupendous magnitude” of Dr. Hawking’s original discovery.

 

In 1974, Dr. Hawking was elected a Fellow of the Royal Society, the world’s oldest scientific organization; in 1982, he was appointed to the Lucasian Chair of Mathematics at Cambridge, a post once held by Isaac Newton. “They say it’s Newton’s chair, but obviously it’s been changed,” he liked to quip.

 

Dr. Hawking also made yearly visits to the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena, which became like a second home. In 2008, he joined the Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics in Waterloo, Ontario, as a visiting researcher.

 

Having conquered black holes, Dr. Hawking set his sights on the origin of the universe and on eliminating that pesky singularity at the beginning of time from models of cosmology. If the laws of physics could break down there, they could break down everywhere.

 

In a meeting at the Vatican in 1982, he suggested that in the final theory there should be no place or time when the laws broke down, even at the beginning. He called the notion the “no boundary” proposal.

 

With James Hartle of the Institute for Theoretical Physics in Santa Barbara, Calif., Dr. Hawking envisioned the history of the universe as a sphere like the Earth. Cosmic time corresponds to latitude, starting with zero at the North Pole and progressing southward.

 

Although time started there, the North Pole was nothing special; the same laws applied there as everywhere else. Asking what happened before the Big Bang, Dr. Hawking said, was like asking what was a mile north of the North Pole — it was not any place, or any time.

 

By then string theory, which claimed finally to explain both gravity and the other forces and particles of nature as tiny microscopically vibrating strings, like notes on a violin, was the leading candidate for a “theory of everything.”

 

In “A Brief History of Time,” Dr. Hawking concluded that “if we do discover a complete theory” of the universe, “it should in time be understandable in broad principle by everyone, not just a few scientists.”

 

He added, “Then we shall all, philosophers, scientists and just ordinary people, be able to take part in the discussion of why it is that we and the universe exist.”

 

“If we find the answer to that,” he continued, “it would be the ultimate triumph of human reason — for then we would know the mind of God.”

 

Until 1974, Dr. Hawking was still able to feed himself and to get in and out of bed. At Jane’s insistence, he would drag himself, hand over hand, up the stairs to the bedroom in his Cambridge home every night, in an effort to preserve his remaining muscle tone. After 1980, care was supplemented by nurses.

 

Dr. Hawking retained some control over his speech up to 1985. But on a trip to Switzerland, he came down with pneumonia. The doctors asked Jane if she wanted his life support turned off, but she said no. To save his life, doctors inserted a breathing tube. He survived, but his voice was permanently silenced.

 

It appeared for a time that he would be able to communicate only by pointing at individual letters on an alphabet board. But when a computer expert, Walter Woltosz, heard about Dr. Hawking’s condition, he offered him a program he had written called Equalizer. By clicking a switch with his still-functioning fingers, Dr. Hawking was able to browse through menus that contained all the letters and more than 2,500 words.

 

Word by word — and when necessary, letter by letter — he could build up sentences on the computer screen and send them to a speech synthesizer that vocalized for him. The entire apparatus was fitted to his motorized wheelchair.

 

Even when too weak to move a finger, he communicated through the computer by way of an infrared beam, which he activated by twitching his right cheek or blinking his eye. The system was expanded to allow him to open and close the doors in his office and to use the telephone and internet without aid.

 

Although he averaged fewer than 15 words per minute, Dr. Hawking found he could speak through the computer better than he had before losing his voice. His only complaint, he confided, was that the speech synthesizer, manufactured in California, had given him an American accent.

 

His decision to write “A Brief History of Time” was prompted, he said, by a desire to share his excitement about “the discoveries that have been made about the universe” with “the public that paid for the research.” He wanted to make the ideas so accessible that the book would be sold in airports.

 

He also hoped to earn enough money to pay for his children’s education. He did. The book’s extraordinary success made him wealthy, a hero to disabled people everywhere and even more famous.

 

The news media followed his movements and activities over the years, from visiting the White House to meeting the Dallas Cowboys cheerleaders, and reported his opinions on everything from national health care (socialized medicine in England had kept him alive) to communicating with extraterrestrials (maybe not a good idea, he said), as if he were a rolling Delphic Oracle.

 

Asked by New Scientist magazine what he thought about most, Dr. Hawking answered: “Women. They are a complete mystery.”

 

In 1990, Dr. Hawking and his wife separated after 25 years of marriage; Jane Hawking wrote about their years together in two books, “Music to Move the Stars: A Life With Stephen Hawking” and “Traveling to Infinity: My Life With Stephen.” The latter became the basis of the 2014 movie “The Theory of Everything.”

 

In 1995, he married Elaine Mason, a nurse who had cared for him since his bout of pneumonia. She had been married to David Mason, the engineer who had attached Dr. Hawking’s speech synthesizer to his wheelchair.

 

In 2004, British newspapers reported that the Cambridge police were investigating allegations that Elaine had abused Dr. Hawking, but no charges were filed, and Dr. Hawking denied the accusations. They agreed to divorce in 2006.

 

A complete list of survivors was not immediately available, but on Wednesday morning, his children, Robert, Lucy and Tim, released the following statement:

 

“We are deeply saddened that our beloved father passed away today. He was a great scientist and an extraordinary man whose work and legacy will live on for many years. His courage and persistence with his brilliance and humour inspired people across the world. He once said, ‘It would not be much of a universe if it wasn’t home to the people you love.’ We will miss him forever.”

 

Among his many honors, Dr. Hawking was named a commander of the British Empire in 1982. In the summer of 2012, he had a star role in the opening of the Paralympics Games in London. The only thing lacking was the Nobel Prize, and his explanation for this was characteristically pithy: “The Nobel is given only for theoretical work that has been confirmed by observation. It is very, very difficult to observe the things I have worked on.”

 

Dr. Hawking was a strong advocate of space exploration, saying it was essential to the long-term survival of the human race. “Life on Earth is at the ever-increasing risk of being wiped out by a disaster, such as sudden global nuclear war, a genetically engineered virus or other dangers we have not yet thought of,” he told an audience in Hong Kong in 2007.

 

Nothing raised as much furor, however, as his increasingly scathing remarks about religion. One attraction of the no-boundary proposal for Dr. Hawking was that there was no need to appeal to anything outside the universe, like God, to explain how it began.

 

In “A Brief History of Time,” he had referred to the “mind of God,” but in “The Grand Design,” a 2011 book he wrote with Leonard Mlodinow, he was more bleak about religion. “It is not necessary to invoke God to light the blue touch paper,” he wrote, referring to the British term for a firecracker fuse, “and set the universe going.”

 

He went further in an interview that year in The Guardian, saying: “I regard the brain as a computer which will stop working when its components fail. There is no heaven or afterlife for broken-down computers; that is a fairy story for people afraid of the dark.”

 

Having spent the best part of his life grappling with black holes and cosmic doom, Dr. Hawking had no fear of the dark.

 

“They’re named black holes because they are related to human fears of being destroyed or gobbled up,” he once told an interviewer. “I don’t have fears of being thrown into them. I understand them. I feel in a sense that I am their master.”

Sur LESECO

Voir aussi

« Lighter is better »: Racism accusations against Heineken

With racist allegations and boycott calls, the Dutch brewer Heineken is currently facing in social …

Laisser un commentaire

Votre adresse de messagerie ne sera pas publiée. Les champs obligatoires sont indiqués avec *